Cover of: Complicities | Sanders, Mark Read Online
Share

Complicities the intellectual and apartheid by Sanders, Mark

  • 17 Want to read
  • ·
  • 68 Currently reading

Published by Duke University Press in Durham .
Written in English

Subjects:

Places:

  • South Africa,
  • South Africa.

Subjects:

  • Louw, N. P. van Wyk 1906-1970.,
  • Modisane, Bloke, d. 1986.,
  • Biko, Steve, 1946-1977.,
  • Breytenbach, Breyten.,
  • South African literature -- History and criticism.,
  • Apartheid -- South Africa.,
  • Apartheid in literature.,
  • South Africa -- Intellectual life -- 20th century.

Book details:

Edition Notes

Includes bibliographical references (p. [213]-264) and index.

StatementMark Sanders.
SeriesPhilosophy and postcoloniality
Classifications
LC ClassificationsPL8014.S6 S25 2002
The Physical Object
Paginationxiii, 273 p. ;
Number of Pages273
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL3553226M
ISBN 100822330032, 0822329980
LC Control Number2002004948

Download Complicities

PDF EPUB FB2 MOBI RTF

  Complicities explores the complicated—even contradictory—position of the intellectual who takes a stand against political policies and ideologies. Mark Sanders argues that intellectuals cannot avoid some degree of complicity in what they oppose and that responsibility can only be achieved with their acknowledgment of this complicity/5.   Complicities explores the complicated—even contradictory—position of the intellectual who takes a stand against political policies and ideologies. Mark Sanders argues that intellectuals cannot avoid some degree of complicity in what they oppose and that responsibility can only be achieved with their acknowledgment of this : $ Complicities book. Read reviews from world’s largest community for readers. This collection of essays does not seek to fashion a bespoke 21st-century Alb Ratings: 0.   Complicities explores the complicated-even contradictory-position of the intellectual who takes a stand against political policies and ideologies. Mark Sanders argues that intellectuals cannot avoid some degree of complicity in what they oppose and that responsibility can only be achieved with their acknowledgment of this complicity/5(9).